Diary of a Disturbing Influence


is religion anti-feminist?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/aug/19/gender.religion

In her article “I’m Not Praying” Cath Elliot makes the claim that religion is anti-feminist. “Christianity is and always has been antithetical to women’s freedom and equality, but it’s certainly not alone in this.” she writes. “It’s the patriarchy made manifest, male-dominated, set up by men to protect and perpetuate their power.”

Although Elliot does have a point–religion has been used to justify horrible human rights abuses that include the systematic oppression of women–her thesis is flawed. Religion is not inherently anti-feminist. Neither is Christianity. Individual Christians are often sexist, as are millions of people who may or may not be religious. The fact that the Christian God is portrayed as male doesn’t make Him sexist; if we want to be really theologically accurate, God is a Spirit and doesn’t even have a gender. He’s even ascribed female characteristics at certain points in the Bible.

There’s the problem of the Old Testament, of course. The Old Testament appears contradictory in its treatment of women, first treating them as property but also featuring strong women like Mariam, Deborah and Jael. The two books named for women are in the Old Testament, and both feature women who blatantly used their sexual power to achieve their own ends. These women are still celebrated by Christians, although the fact that Ruth “lay down” with Boaz and that Esther was a concubine are usually ignored.

I think it is Christianity’s traditional attitude toward women that feeds Elliot’s perception. My personal experience has been similar to hers. Most conservative Christians I know are sexist at least on some level. Some are more vocal than others. Worst of all, the women of this movement allow themselves to be oppressed. They are taught the lie that a woman’s place is at home, that she cannot preach or teach men, and that her main function is to be a subservient breeding machine for the head of the household. This is propaganda on the scale of Orwell’s Doublespeak, only this time the Party’s slogan (“War is Peace; Freedom is Slavery; Ignorance is Strength”) is lauded as Biblical truth.

Christian women have taken gradual steps toward gender equality. The United Methodist Church, the United Church of Christ, the Reformed Church of America, and certain Presbyterian and Anglican congregations permit female ministers. These churches recognize the inherent equality of women with men. But most denominations still forbid female leadership. The Southern Baptist Convention (with whom Cedarville is affiliated) recently reaffirmed its adherence to traditonal male headship. This creates a poisonous environment for women, and adds to the unflattering perception that people like Cath Elliot have of Christianity.

As long as women believe the conflicting idea that although they are of equal worth to men they are to be submissive to them, Christianity will be used as a tool to oppress and domineer females. Those of us who don’t swallow that lie need to take a stand. We need to reject the false dichotomy projected by Christian patriarchy. Until then, Cath Elliot’s point stands largely unchallenged.


5 Comments so far
Leave a comment

I absolutely disagree that Christianity is AS oppressive towards women as people make it out to be.

Yes, there are plenty of bad examples that can be drawn upon throughout history, but I think the problem is that too many people grab ahold of those examples and will not let go. As a result, they miss out on a rich history of positive examples towards women that they neither notice or seem to want to explore. And there are many examples that are truly forgotten and neglected.

If we focused on exploring all of the positive examples, I think we would find ourselves so much more affirmed as women.

Look at such medieval women as Julian of Norwich, Clare of Assisi, Teresa of Avila, Margery Kemp, etc. These were women who lived in a culture where we can certainly find ideological negativity towards women, but did the day-to-day reality of that culture hold them back? Some might argue yes (and we have to admit they did have more practical limitations), but just reading the biography of, say, Margery Kempe reveals a woman who truly “wore the pants” and whose spirit and worth was by no means affected by an ideologies of pessimism towards women.

I think we have to be careful not to ascribe all past ideologies to historical reality – if reality was obeying the ideologies, someone would have shoved a lady like Margery Kempe into a corner – and yet no one once ever told her to go hide in the kitchen.

It is so much more fulfilling to recognize the negative, but glory in the positive. And if we truly begin to ivestigate, we will find so much positivity towards women that people have downright ignored and forgotten, all because they are still fuming at the ones who promoted negativity. (I did two Master’s degrees where I explored this topic, and found long-forgotten positives towards women where no one thought I would find much to say. It is absolutely out there.)
-Alexandra
http://alexandrakent.wordpress.com/

Comment by jcilt

It’s difficult to ignore the negative attitudes toward women, though I don’t think you’re exactly suggesting that we ignore them, but rather focus on something else. There is such widespread oppression toward women in the world that positive advances in gender equality do tend to get overshadowed. I’m always encouraged by examples of women who bucked the traditions of their time and culture.

Christianity and women have had a difficult relationship. For every example of a Christian woman who was respected, there are numerous examples of women who weren’t. And the current trend toward extreme Calvinism and patriarchy within the church does not bode well.

Comment by axisone

I agree with you. I just think it drags us down even further as women to keep dwelling on the negativity. I think humanity as a whole has experienced severe abuse by ideologies that have proved destructive, not just women – but we have to move on and find new beliefs that promote our value and worth. We cannot forget, and we should remember so that those things do not happen again, but like anything in life we will be better off if we turn our minds to the beauty of humanity and of the feminine, as expressed through new thoughts and historically forgotten/neglected ones. If we can show that there have been positive expressions to women in the past, we can build on those in the present and increase our worth as a gender.

Thanks for replying!
-Alexandra
http://alexandrakent.wordpress.com/

Comment by jcilt

[...] condemnation from any religious institution will make me get on my knees so they can measure the length of this hem. Possibly [...]

Pingback by Defend the Sluts « Ann’s Blog

Here is a historical article that you may find addresses your question-

http://hubpages.com/hub/minister-female

Comment by Laura




Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>